TR-31 vs. TR-34: What’s the Difference?
In the world of ATM security and key management, compliance with industry standards is essential to ensure secure operations and maintain customer trust. Two commonly discussed standards are TR-31 and TR-34, each addressing distinct aspects of encryption key management and distribution. While both are vital to financial institutions, understanding their differences can help you determine how they apply to your operations.
This article provides an overview of TR-31 and TR-34, their primary functions, differences and how they benefit financial institutions in enhancing encryption key management and compliance.
What Is TR-31?
TR-31, short for Technical Report 31, governs the secure storage and transmission of symmetric cryptographic keys during their operational life cycle. It provides a framework for managing symmetric cryptographic keys in a standardized format, focusing on:
1. Key Block Format:
TR-31 defines how encryption keys are arranged within a key block to ensure secure storage and transfer. These key blocks contain metadata that specifies how the key is intended to be used, aiding in clear identification and management of each key.
Common metadata includes:
- Algorithm information
- Usage information
- Distribution information
2. Operational Key Management:
It ensures the secure handling of cryptographic keys as they perform functions like encrypting PINs or facilitating secure communications. Learn more about TR-31 and how the TSS A98 Key Management System simplifies ATM key management.
3. Compliance with Standards:
TR-31 enhances institutions ability to comply with regulatory requirements by protecting keys during their entire lifecycle, from generation to eventual retirement.
What Is TR-34?
TR-34, or Technical Report 34, focuses on the initial distribution and injection of asymmetric crytographic keys into secure devices like ATMs and payment terminals. This standard facilitates:
1. Remote Key Distribution:
TR-34 supports the secure generation and delivery of keys from a central key management system to an endpoint, such as an ATM’s secure cryptographic module.
2. Public Key Infrastructure (PKI):
Unlike TR-31, TR-34 utilizes PKI for key delivery, utilizing certificates to ensure that both the sender (key management system) and receiver (ATM) are authenticated and trusted.
3. Key Initialization:
TR-34 is specifically designed for key injection, ensuring that secure devices begin their operations with the necessary encryption keys already in place.
Key Differences Between TR-31 and TR-34
| Characteristic | TR-31 | TR-34 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Secure management of operational encryption keys | Initial distribution and injection of keys |
| Technology Used | Private Shared Symmetric Key | Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) |
| Purpose | Securely stores and transmits data | Establishes secure initial key relationships |
| Encryption | Symmetric encryption | Asymmetric encryption |
How They Work Together
TR-31 and TR-34 are not competing standards but complementary ones. While TR-34 ensures that cryptographic keys are securely distributed to devices, TR-31 takes over once those keys are in use, ensuring their secure handling throughout their lifecycle. Together, they form a robust framework for end-to-end encryption key management.
Why Understanding These Standards Matters
For financial institutions and ATM management companies, compliance with TR-31 and TR-34 is more than a regulatory requirement—it’s a critical step in protecting sensitive customer data and maintaining trust. Adopting solutions that support both standards ensures that your organization is prepared for the evolving landscape of digital security.
By leveraging platforms like the TSS A98 Key Management System, you can simplify compliance with TR-31 and TR-34 while enhancing operational efficiency. Whether you’re managing keys in use or initializing them in new devices, the A98 provides the tools you need to stay secure and compliant.
Understanding the differences between TR-31 and TR-34 allows financial institutions to implement more secure and efficient encryption key management strategies. While TR-34 sets the stage with secure key distribution, TR-31 ensures ongoing protection as those keys perform critical functions. Together, these standards form the foundation of a resilient security ecosystem.
If you’re ready to explore how TR-31 and TR-34 compliance can benefit your institution, contact us to learn more about the TSS A98 system and how it can support your security goals.
Streamlining ATM Security: How the TSS A98 Comvelope System Simplifies Manual Key Loading
When it comes to ATM security, staying ahead of threats requires innovative solutions and streamlined processes. Financial institutions are increasingly adopting Remote Key Loading (RKL) systems to enhance security and efficiency. However, for ATMs that still rely on Manual Key Loading (MKL), there is a game-changing solution that can bridge the gap: Trusted Security Solutions’ (TSS) A98 Comvelope System.
Comvelopes not only simplify the manual key-loading process but also reduce operational complexity and the risk of human error. In this blog, we’ll explain how Comvelopes work, their benefits over traditional MKL, and how they provide a smoother transition for financial institutions on their path to RKL adoption.
What are Comvelopes, and How Do They Work?
A Comvelope is a specially designed, encrypted envelope that contains one component of an ATM encryption key. We generate and securely produce these Comvelopes, eliminating the need for in-house key generation equipment.
Unlike traditional key components, which are a matched pair and must be used together, Comvelopes are unique in that any two Comvelopes can be combined to form a secure key. This flexibility drastically reduces logistical challenges, allowing technicians to carry a stack of Comvelopes and efficiently service multiple ATMs in a single trip.
Once two Comvelopes are selected and entered into the ATM, they become tied together as key components, providing the same level of security as traditional methods but with greater ease and efficiency.
Traditional MKL vs. Comvelopes: Key Differences
Manual Key Loading (MKL) has long been the standard for ATM key management, but it comes with inherent inefficiencies and risks:
- Matched Pair Requirement: Traditional MKL requires using the exact two key components that were generated as a pair. If one component is lost or mismatched, the process is halted, leading to delays and potential security risks.
- Manual Complexity: The process involves multiple steps and personnel, increasing the likelihood of human error and requiring significant time and oversight.
In contrast, our A98 Comvelope System offers:
- Flexibility: Any two Comvelopes can be selected from thousands in storage, reducing the need for meticulous component pairing.
- Efficiency:
- Streamlined Compliance: Two technicians are still required to maintain compliance with dual control and split knowledge protocols, but each technician can carry multiple Comvelopes, enabling them to service several ATMs efficiently without the need to coordinate specific key pairs.
- Operational Speed: The ability to service multiple ATMs in one trip reduces downtime and improves network efficiency.
- Security:
- Unopened Comvelopes: The encrypted Comvelopes ensure that even if lost or intercepted, the key components remain secure.
- Reinforced Protection: The A98 system enforces dual control, requiring two technicians to provide a Comvelope when keying an ATM, adding an additional layer of security.
Benefits for Financial Institutions
- Operational Efficiency
Using Comvelopes reduces the complexity of key management by allowing greater flexibility in the field. Technicians can service multiple ATMs more efficiently, minimizing downtime and improving overall productivity. - Reduced Human Error
By eliminating the need for exact key component matching, Comvelopes simplify the process and reduce the chance of errors that could compromise ATM security. - Cost Savings
Financial institutions can save on labor costs and operational overhead with Comvelopes. Comvelopes streamline key generation, management and storage, reducing the resources needed for these processes. - Security and Compliance
TSS A98 Comvelopes meet strict security and compliance standards, including TR-31 requirements. Each Comvelope is encrypted and secure, ensuring financial institutions remain compliant with evolving regulations.
Supporting the Transition to Remote Key Loading (RKL)
While Comvelopes offer significant advantages for Manual Key Loading, the industry trend is moving towards Remote Key Loading (RKL) for even greater efficiency and security. Many financial institutions come to TSS for our A98 Remote Key Loading System, but they may still have a fleet of ATMs requiring manual key loading.
Comvelopes provide an intermediate solution that helps financial institutions maintain security and efficiency until they fully transition to RKL. The A98 platform offers flexibility, as the Comvelope solution can be easily upgraded to support RKL on the same fleet with software changes. Financial institutions also have the option to operate both Comvelopes and RKL simultaneously within the A98 system. By simplifying MKL, Comvelopes can reduce the burden on IT teams and ATM management while RKL upgrades are implemented.
Why Choose TSS for Your ATM Key Management?
At Trusted Security Solutions, we understand the challenges financial institutions face in securing their ATM networks. Our A98 solutions are designed to provide:
- Dependable Solutions: Proven systems that enhance security and efficiency
- Responsive Support: Personalized service to help you navigate key management challenges
- Expertise You Can Trust: Years of experience in ATM security and compliance consulting
Whether you’re looking to streamline your existing MKL process or transition to RKL, our A98 Comvelope System and Remote Key Loading solutions offer a secure, efficient and compliant path forward.
Conclusion
In an evolving landscape of ATM security, the A98 Comvelope System from TSS offers financial institutions a smart way to reduce complexity, save costs and maintain security. By allowing any two Comvelopes to form a secure key, the system eliminates the rigid constraints of traditional MKL and provides a smoother transition toward Remote Key Loading.
Ready to enhance your ATM security and operational efficiency? Get in touch with Trusted Security Solutions to learn how our A98 Comvelope System can support your key management needs and position you for future success.
Contact us today and discover how TSS can help you stay secure, compliant and efficient.
Should I Update My EPP? How to Ensure Your EPP is TR-31 Compliant & Aligns with PCI Regulations
In the banking and ATM industry, EPPs (Encrypting PIN Pads) are crucial to ATM systems. EPPs are the everyday devices you interact with when entering your ATM's PIN (Personal Identification Number). They are critical for securely capturing and encrypting PIN entries, preventing fraud and securing customer data. However, different versions of EPPs are created by different manufacturers, with many banks operating older versions like EPP3 by Diebold, which PCI declared “end of life” on April 30, 2021. How can you ensure your systems are up to date and compliant with TR-31 and PCI regulations? Trusted Security Solution is here to help you navigate this complicated and changing landscape and ensure your systems are compliant and up to date.
Past & Current Landscape of EPPs
The payment industry has seen significant changes in the standards governing EPPs. Earlier versions of EPPs provided basic encryption and tamper-resistant features. These systems became more robust with advanced encryption methods and stronger security features as they were updated. However, many banks still operate on older devices like EPP3, which PCI declared outdated on April 30, 2021. With little direction on the next steps, many banks are confused. The decision to continue using EPP devices is left to payment brands like Visa and Mastercard.
The Confusion Surrounding EPP Mandates
Some questions that remain in the ATM & banking industry after the announcement by PCI are:
- Should we continue using our current EPPs?
- Does my current EPP support payment transactions?
- Do we need to upgrade our devices immediately?
- Who should we reach out to for guidance?
Each payment brand has its own set of mandates regarding expired EPPs. What may be acceptable for Visa can differ from Mastercard’s requirements. Such disparities add to the confusion and make it challenging for banks to ensure they remain compliant. So, it’s important to contact your payment card brand and ATM vendor to answer the questions above and many more.
Why Reaching Out to Your ATM Vendor is Crucial
As you prepare for TR-31 and PCI audits, clear guidance on your EPPs' status is essential. This is where reaching out to your ATM vendor becomes critical. Gain the below and much more by directly consulting with your ATM manufacturer:
- Clarity on Compliance: Understanding whether your current EPPs are still supported and if they meet TR-31 requirements.
- Guidance on Upgrades: Knowing whether an upgrade is necessary and, if so, who to contact and how to implement it.
- Assurance for Audits: Ensuring all devices and systems align with the latest security standards to avoid penalties.
Take the Next Step
Taking these steps will help maintain security and compliance, ultimately improving your customers' experience.
- Review Current EPPs: Identify the current models and their compliance status.
- Consult Payment Brands: Contact your payment card account executive for specific payment transaction mandates and guidance.
- Consult ATM Vendors: Contact your ATM vendor for specific questions about hardware support and TR-31 compliance.
- Plan Upgrades: If upgrades are necessary, plan and execute them before your PCI audit deadlines.
- Stay Informed: With a partner like Trusted Security Solutions, stay updated on PCI standards and payment brand mandates to stay ahead of compliance requirements.
Navigating EPP mandates and ensuring compliance is challenging, but it is essential for maintaining the security and trust of your banking operations. By proactively reaching out to payment brands and ATM vendors and planning necessary upgrades, you can ensure compliance with PCI requirements to avoid potential issues during PCI audits. At Trusted Security Solutions, we offer dependable solutions you can rely on so you’re not navigating this challenging landscape alone.



